I’m grading final papers.
I take my time and write a lot of comments. I always write comments,
maybe too many, but I am determined my presence will help someone become a
better writer.
Because to write is to think. As historian David
McCullough says, “Good writing is good thinking.”
Boy, is that a hard concept to teach. Yet, as one who
made a living stringing words together, I know this. I think of it every
time I write one of these posts. Sometimes
I reread a draft and think, “I didn’t know I thought that.” But writing – crafting – each of these essays requires thought and order and research and
review.
Good writing is good thinking. How do you teach that?
With
the final speeches stacked on my table I know I’m at the end of my time with
these 23 young souls. Have I made a difference? Would the stars have been stars
whether or not I drove to Boone two times a week? What about the others? Have
my admonishments and guidelines made a difference?
Will
they remember my personally minted mnemonic?
SEEOAT. An effective speech needs Structure, Evidence, writing for the
Ear, an Objective, to be targeted to the Audience, and have a Theme (which can
be stated in one sentence).
I’m
fairly new to classroom instruction. I learn something every session, every
student. I know now, three semesters in, that teaching is an act of faith.
Faith that my commitment, time, preparation, and belief in the next generation
are worth the effort.
I
also know, as I tell my students when stressing the importance of attendance, that,
as Woody Allen allegedly said, “80 percent of life is showing up."
So,
after showing up in Appalachian State’s Walker Hall 28 times this semester,
we’re at the end of our time together. I’m worried. Did I teach? Did they
learn?
Will my fledgling speechwriters who are about to fly away
ever understand the absolute
importance of structure? Did I stress enough that not using an outline is not
optional? If reading John McPhee on structure couldn’t convince them, what
possibly could? Maybe a hammer.
I
close the computer on my Excel grade book and go outside to attack the weeds in
our neglected garden. I need a task where I can see tangible results of my
efforts. Yet, the disarray in the garden plot reminds me of their speeches.
Weeds. Things that don’t belong. All over the place.
I attack the weeds with the same fervor I attack my
students’ writing. One big clump is using “that” and not “who” when referring
to a person. Pokeweed is random
apostrophes where there is no possessive. The endless use of they, a
plural, when referring to an individual or single entity is pigweed. Yet more garden
invaders represent run-on sentences and endless paragraphs.
When
will the speaker ever catch her breath? Oh, and then there are sections that,
like Superman, leap tall thoughts in a single bound. Where are the transitions?
On what wild ride are you taking the audience?
Good writing is good thinking. What are they thinking? Are they thinking?
So much to teach. So little time. Use concrete details.
Show me, don’t tell me. Cite a source for a big statement. Use active
voice. Delete unnecessary words. Make every word count.
Good
writing is good thinking. If you can organize your thoughts, back it up with
solid and convincing evidence, and make it come alive with story, you can
change minds, hell, maybe even lives.
My
first job was copy editor and proofreader. I loved being a “comma chaser.” But, in grading student work I choose my battles. I’ve given up on persuading them
to use “more than” rather than “over,” but for who and not that, I am
relentless. Even Frank Bruni, an opinion writer for The New York Times, pitched into battle with me. I use his April
8, 2017, column on “What Happened to Who?” as an extra credit assignment.
Still, the “that” surplus persists.
The weed attack was the day before I was to travel to
Boone for the last class meeting – hear one final speech, hand back papers, and
introduce the class to Pauli, the class mascot.
Pauli
is our six-month-old German Shorthaired Pointer. At the first class meeting I had supplemented my introduction with a projected photo of our new puppy. I
told the class that if I ever didn’t return one of their assignments, well, it
would be because my dog ate their homework. And
she did. But it was only once.
Our dog helps make me more human. Over the course of the
semester, my photo updates of my canine companion helped me connect with the
dog-loving students. In my short teaching career, I’ve learned to be effective
I must be real. It is not all about subject matter. Like most things, teaching
is about relationships.
And, I work to form relationships. For the first half of
the semester I fear I will never learn all their names. Okay, only seven guys,
I can do that. Except, once I learn the name of the guy with the beard, the
beard disappears. Then, the guy who always wears a ball cap comes hatless. And
the women, why must the brunettes all sit together? The first year, the blondes all
blended together. For months.
Somehow, by about Week 7 I know their names. Then,
through their speeches I learn more, far more, about them as individuals: their
backgrounds, hopes, interests, dreams, fears, and losses.
As I record the grades for the final speeches, I am
impressed with the topics and themes. Several wrote about the college
experience, but their remarks offered refreshing insights and personal
perspectives that would be helpful for incoming freshmen. One student’s final
speech made us laugh out loud. Still more had the class riveted. One delivered
remarks on mental health and depression and cited compelling evidence – the
four-times higher rate of suicide attempts for LGBTQ youth.
We were spellbound as students gave speeches with stories of child abuse, of the
experience of being a brown child in a white media culture, of parents devoted to helping a sick child, and more. I witnessed much mature self-awareness from
such young people.
Okay,
there’s work to do on sentence length, paragraph breaks, and who and that, but,
wow, they sure get it about the power of story. Facts are important. Story
brings it home. And, good thinking makes good writing.
Pauli and I walk to meet the students. We hear the final
talk – the speaker rises to the occasion. Pauli is a hit, as is to be expected
from such a sweet gal. I receive flowers and two
cards, which I’ll read later, and students linger to talk. I haven’t
been teaching for long, but, to me, lingering on the last day is a clear sign
that the prep-time, the grading, the driving, and all my efforts are worth it.
Maybe I do make a difference.
P.S. One student wrote about me for HerCampus. That was sweet. I had told her about how my
retirement planning had targeted the letter P – prose, pedaling, paddling,
puppies, politics, and pedagogy.
These are sea oats. SEEOAT is a mnemonic. |